Earth’s
Carrying Capacity Strained by Population Growth
By
Dr. Michael A. Bengwayan
New
York City---Earth’s renewable resources and carrying capacity is being severely
strained to “support with some degree and comfort and individual choice” the
world’s human population.
This
is due to an overrun of fertility rates since 2000, that caused a global population swell feared
to reach 10 billion before 2050, the US
Council on Environmental Quality and the State Department said in a three-year study called ”Reconnaissance of
the Future Global 2000”.
“The
declines in carrying capacity, already evident in scattered areas around the
world point to a phenomenon that is fast spreading”, notes the study.
“Unless
nations collectively and individually take bold and imaginative steps toward
improved environmental, social and
economic conditions, reduced fertility, better management of resources and better protection of the
environment, the world will expect trouble most of the 21st
century”, warns the study.
Grim Outlook
As
excerpted by the Population Reference Bureau in its Intercom publication,
“Global 2000” rather gives a grim outlook for the world in this century.
The
study details some of the consequences should global population trends continue
unchanged in this century this wise:
--Extinction
of at least 500,000 plant and animal species by 2050.
--A
40 percent slash in all remaining forests in the less developed countries and
loss of several inches of topsoil from croplands the world over.
--Much
less arable land per person, only one quarter hectare on the average from the
four fifths of a hectare.
--More
than half of the world’s 2 billion barrels of original petroleum reserved
resources will already be consumed.
--Upsurge
in prices of vital resources over the inflation level.
--Declines
in per capita water supply by 35 to 47 percent.
--Four
fifths of the world population will live
in less developed countries.
--Widening
gap between the richest and the poorest with great disparities within
countries.
--More
deaths from hunger and diseases especially among babies and young children and
more mentally and physically-handicapped cases among those surviving infancy.
The
most troubling of these outcomes is the drop of productivity of Earth’s
renewable resources, according to the study.
Technological Advances Will Not Stop the Inevitable
And
more troubling, the study suggests, is that even allowing the technological
developments and adoptions, the world’s human population will only be within a
few generations of reaching the entire Earth’s carrying capacity.
So
what are the chances of stemming the tide and averting the consequences?
Not
too good.
As
the study bares, there is no silver bullet. “There are no quick or easy
solutions, particularly in countries and regions where population pressure is
already leading to a reduction of the carrying capacity of the land.”
The
assessment stems from observations that living conditions spawned by
population-induced environmental deterioration render more difficult reduction
of fertility to replacement level (at which the population of a country stops
growing).
Some Nations Will be Hard Up in Feeding their
Population
As
the grim scenario looms, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (UNFAO) bared
that at least 28 developing countries would not be able to feed their
respective countries by the middle of the century because yields will be
adversely affected by climate change and genetic erosion.
Four
of the 28 countries are in Asia—Philippines, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Vietnam. Seven
in Latin America—Jamaica, Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Dominican Republic,
Guadeloupe, Windward Isles, Guatemala; 17 in Africa—Tunisia, Morocco, Zimbabwe,
Botswana, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Swaziland, Benin, Upper Volta, Togo, Mali,
Malawi, Namibia, Comoros Isles, Ethiopia, Nigeria Uganda.
The
reasons, UNFAO said are inferior planting seeds and genetic resources,
increasing desertification, prolonged droughts and diminishing water supply,
deteriorating soil quality and global warming.
Loss of Genetic Resources
Biorich
areas in the world responsible for food and medical genes important to humanity
face erosion most critically in this century, the US Council of Environmental
Quality report stresses. As such, these
regions holding potential genetic properties of plants or animals that can be
used to develop better varieties of crops in farming or develop better
livestock, need priority conservation
efforts if the world is to tame the population boom.
Genetic
diversity is being lost as species are becoming extinct; pharmacists are losing
raw materials from which new drugs are developed; agricultural scientists are losing wild
relatives of crop plants that can ensure more productive or pest and
disease-tolerant food crops, and; wild animal breeds are being lost which could
have improved farm animal breeding.
In
its September 2018 report, the Swiss-based International Union for the
Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the world’s watchdog of flora and fauna, said an
additional 27,000 species are in danger of becoming extinct.
Of the number, 41 percent are amphibians, 5 percent
mammals, 34 percent conifers, 13 percent birds,
31 percent sharks and manta rays, 33 percent corals, and 27 percent
selected crustaceans.
Wild
species are building blocks for the betterment of human life but their loss can
mean loss of mankind. The study suggests one way humans may evade the
inevitable is by going back to the way of traditional communities.
“Indigenous peoples or ‘Ecosystem
people’ value biodiversity as a part of their livelihood as well as through
cultural and religious sentiments. A great variety of crops have been
cultivated in traditional agricultural systems and this permitted a wide range
of produce to be grown and marketed throughout the year and acted as an
insurance against the failure of one crop. In recent years farmers have begun
to receive economic incentives to grow cash crops for national or international
markets,” the study reminds.
It
may be well to learn from them.