By Michael A. Bengwayan,
Ph.D., Environmental Resource Management
In environmental resource
management, we have what we call environmental accounting which is the sum of
costs connected to the actual or potential
deterioration, damage, destruction of natural assets due to human, especially economic
activities. We did not expect the media to be thorough in their reportage
regarding this as not many in the pen-pushing noble work had all the
ingredients in environmental journalism. Now that Boracay is closed, one is
wont to ask, how much damage has really been done on the island, will it
recover, what and how intense is the marine ecosystem affected?
It is important to ask
these questions because of increasing and worsening environmental problems, in the midst of tourism economic, social and
technological developments which threaten the future
and sustainable development in Boracay and neighboring marine ecosystem.
Fishing and shellfish industry are being hurt by harmful algal blooms that kill fish and contaminate shell fish. The losses spell lower source of food for the next generations.
The marine debris – trash and other solid material that enter the bay from the wetlands now occupied by squatters – threaten wildlife and marine habitats, presents health and safety concerns for humans, and imposes costs to the island and coastal areas, not only now but more so, the future. Plastic wastes, consistently makes up a significant proportion of the marine debris polluting the seabed, corals seagrasses and marine life. It does not biodegrade and is consumed by marine life, killing fishes, turtles and other aquatic life. The costs can never be estimated.
Preventing trash from entering the sea is difficult due to the many sources, including lax municipal laws of the island, corrupt officials, poor trash management by hotels, restaurants and communities and incomplete waste facilities, widespread littering by tourists, and inadequate municipal storm sewers carrying trash in rainwater runoff.
The closure of Boracay should not only be measured by the loss of money or jobs because tourism, when irresponsible, does not only affect the Filipino as a victim.
The victim here appears to be much of the future life in the Philippines.
No comments:
Post a Comment